Skip to content

up to python 3.10 #269

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

up to python 3.10 #269

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

dpineiden
Copy link
Contributor

To use with python 3.10 some little changes are necesary.

Callable uses collections.abc

  • ast collections Callable

Drop loop arg

  • asyncio_net open_connection
  • wait_for

@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ def expr(val, nesting_depth=20):

if isinstance(val, RqlQuery):
return val
elif isinstance(val, collections.Callable):
elif isinstance(val, collections.abc.Callable):

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

change also needed for collections.Mapping

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was fixed with #253.

Copy link
Member

@gabor-boros gabor-boros left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This PR actually not updates the code to be python 3.10 compatible. Although the net_asyncio is "fixed", I'm not sure that the pinned dependencies, like tornado, supports python 3.10.

@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ def connect(self, timeout):
self._streamreader, self._streamwriter = yield from asyncio.open_connection(
self._parent.host,
self._parent.port,
loop=self._io_loop,
#loop=self._io_loop, droped at py3.10
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This makes the driver backward incompatible with older python versions.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It does? How so? The parameter was optional and otherwise it uses the active loop.

@srh
Copy link
Contributor

srh commented Oct 6, 2023

Going to close, because, first, this only drops one of the loop parameters (there are a couple more that need to be dropped) and second, the change to collections.abc.Callable should be unnecessary as we rename collections.abc while importing.

And PR #296 removes all the loop params that need it.

Also, the collections.abc change would break Python <3.3, which we don't want to deliberately break unless it's basically necessary.

@srh srh closed this Oct 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants